Comments on: Porn Stars as Art

By: adult xxx porn movies

adult xxx porn movies — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:48:14 +0000

adult xxx porn movies…

[...] mapinfo trial [...]…

By: Jay Devine

Jay Devine — Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:51:09 +0000

What is art and what is pornographic is quite subjective in my opinion. I have seen very strong reactions from people to what in my opinion was art (or celebration of human beauty).

By: Administrator

Administrator — Wed, 06 Apr 2005 02:12:51 +0000

That does it. Next non-sidebar post will be on Wegman.

“did you know he came to our school,” . . . bastard.

By: Dr. Wagner

Dr. Wagner — Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:34:43 +0000

Haw. See I had intentionally misspelled her named like the city in order that somebody searching for her in a google wouldn’t pop up this thread. But Wegman, you’re on your own.

Did you know he came to our school one time? To do a workshop or something on photography. I missed it.

By: Administrator

Administrator — Tue, 05 Apr 2005 01:46:39 +0000

I don’t know why I care, but it is geddes, not gettys.

And anyone else who makes funny posts about the dog guy or the baby lady gets their ip banned.

By: hud

hud — Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:43:10 +0000

Basically, when I was checking to see which porn stars were in it, I was checking to see if Ron Jeremy was in it. Ron being the portly fellow in the Hawahian print that Wah has posted up above. Maybe knowing who Ron is is too much porn knowledge but I tend to think not knowing who Ron is is being culturally disconnected.

I think Wegman and Gettys should get together and do a book with Dogs and Babies! Then Dr. Wagner’s head would explode.

By: Dr. Wagner

Dr. Wagner — Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:16:57 +0000

Y’know who is a really good photographer? That guy with the dogs, Wegman. I mean that is art. You guys ever seen that? I love the statement that it makes about society and how we wear clothes, but really we’re just like dogs or something. I don’t usually go for “deep concept” art, but that stuff will just make you stop and think. And oh man, I like the pictures of the babies dressed up like animals…wait…whoa…it’s like they are total opposites of each other! Like the two ends of the art photography spectrum! On one end you have Wegman and his dogs dressed up like people and on the other Anne Gettys with her babies dressed up like animals!! And I guess all the rest of the art world falls somewhere in between. Like you have pictures of porn stars dressed up like people and then you have pictures of regular people naked like porn stars!! Whoa. I’m gonna blow my mind if I think about it too long.

By: Administrator

Administrator — Sat, 02 Apr 2005 01:20:56 +0000

I really hope that your mom is reading this. And in case she is, he didn’t pick up any of his porn “habits” from his old roommate.

By: Kathleen

Kathleen — Fri, 01 Apr 2005 23:18:48 +0000

Um, Hud, dude. I hope you were looking for feminist/activist porn folks like Annie Sprinkle, in order to ascertain whether or not the book was cheese or cool, ’cause this “I was more curious about which porn stars were in it then I was about the meaning behind the work” sounds like you might be a little bit too knowledgeable about porn stars for my comfort level, me being your sister, and me being of the opinion that porn generally commodofies and degrades women and all . . .

Oh, by the way, I just told mom last week to start reading this blog. Hm. Wonder if she has?

Greenfield-Saunders was commissioned by the Miami Art Museum to take photos of artists in the New Work series a few years ago; my husband was one of them. It was an okay photo, but only that. I don’t feel he’s worth his reputation.

By: jp!

jp! — Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:01:52 +0000

i’d imagine there is a thicket of legal issues (consent to film, consent of participants, consent to do a ‘for profit’ action–if it was, hell, visitation policy, etc