Comments on: b’ham

By: hud

hud — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:40:41 +0000

Comedy. I just checked back here on a different computer and saw that the image was much brighter and thought “ahh, it was just my monitor” only to find that you adjusted it.

Still freaked out that you sister is married though; I only seem to be able to imagine her at the age of, like, 12.

By: Roy Adkins

Roy Adkins — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:04:38 +0000

There were several reasons I didn’t take photos, the least of which was the professional.

I agree on the darkness of the image. I adjusted the curves to use it as a test print for an epson 2200 on some watercolor paper, but I didn’t lighten it up before posting it, which I think I will do right now . . .

By: Hud

Hud — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:23:49 +0000

Man, I hear that. I see 18 year olds running around with $800 digital SLR’s and I get seriously jealous. I get plain annoyed when they don’t even understand aperture settings. So, do I understand this to mean that you didn’t take pictures because there was a “professional” taking photos?

I’m kind of freaked out that your sister is married by the way.

I like the photo but, and maybe its my screen, it seems kind of dark.

By: Roy Adkins

Roy Adkins — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:53:21 +0000

I don’t recall you advertising your professional photography services, but I know you understand lighting and composition better than many

By: Dr. Wagner

Dr. Wagner — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:42:08 +0000

Oh man, guilty. I get paid for tking pictures all the time…and I have barely a clue what I am doing. I use what little I learned from hanging out with you guys and from back at the TV station, but seriously, I know I am not using my camera to its fullest potential for sheer lack of understanding it.

It’s one of those cannon digitals.